Menu
Excerpts
Exhibits
Collections
Originals
Categories
Map
Search
Person
Felix Frankfurter
Bylines
The Case of Sacco and Vanzetti
After Sacco and Vanzetti's final appeal was rejected, Felix Frankfurter, then a professor at Harvard Law School, laid out the many problems with their trials.
by
Felix Frankfurter
via
The Atlantic
on
March 1, 1927
Related Excerpts
Load More
Viewing 1–20 of 26
A Prisoner of His Own Restraint
Felix Frankfurter was renowned as a liberal lawyer and advocate. Why did he turn out to be such a conservative Supreme Court justice?
by
Jed S. Rakoff
via
New York Review of Books
on
October 13, 2022
The Justice Who Wanted the Supreme Court to Get Out of the Way
Felix Frankfurter warned that politicians, not the courts, should make policy.
by
John Fabian Witt
via
The New Republic
on
August 26, 2022
The Supreme Court's World War II Battles
Cliff Sloan’s new book explains how the Franklin Roosevelt-shaped Court wrestled with individual rights as the nation fought to save itself and the world.
by
Robert L. Tsai
via
Washington Monthly
on
September 22, 2023
When History Becomes Precedent in the OLC
Official decisions about military intervention and executive power are often based on outdated historical interpretations.
by
Mary L. Dudziak
via
Balkinization
on
January 16, 2023
American Mandarins
David Halberstam’s title The Best and the Brightest was steeped in irony. Did these presidential advisers earn it?
by
Edward Tenner
via
The American Scholar
on
March 24, 2022
FDR’s Compliant Justices
The Supreme Court’s deference to FDR during World War II resulted in unjustifiable ethical breaches.
by
Jed S. Rakoff
via
New York Review of Books
on
November 14, 2024
partner
What’s Behind the Fight Over Whether Nonprofits Can Be Forced to Disclose Donors’ Names
A reminder of how tricky it is to balance protecting transparency and freedom of association.
by
Helen J. Knowles-Gardner
via
Made By History
on
January 16, 2024
How FDR’s Influence Over the Supreme Court Transformed History
In “The Court at War,” Cliff Sloan examines the close relationship between FDR and the high court during World War II.
by
Michael Bobelian
via
Washington Post
on
September 22, 2023
The Railway Labor Act Allowed Congress to Break the Rail Strike. We Should Get Rid of It.
Congress was able to break the rail strike last week because of a century-old law designed to weaken the disruptive power of unions.
by
Nelson Lichtenstein
,
Andrew Yamakawa Elrod
via
Jacobin
on
December 7, 2022
Originalism Is Bunk. Liberal Lawyers Shouldn’t Fall For It.
The more liberals present originalist arguments, the more they legitimate originalism.
by
Ruth Marcus
via
Washington Post
on
December 1, 2022
original
A Tour of Mount Auburn Cemetery
Two centuries of New England intellectual history through the lives and ideas of people who are memorialized there.
by
Kathryn Ostrofsky
on
September 7, 2022
Building Uncle Sam, Inc.
These Progressive Era Republicans wanted to run the Federal government like a business.
by
Paul Moreno
via
Law & Liberty
on
May 25, 2022
A Brief Guide to Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings, the Silliest Ritual In Washington
Supreme Court confirmation hearings feature senators talking a lot, and nominees nodding politely until they can leave.
by
Jay Willis
via
Balls And Strikes
on
March 15, 2022
We All Live in the John Birch Society’s World Now
In his lifetime, Robert Welch toiled in the mocked and marginal fringe. Today his ideas are the mainstream of the American right.
by
Chris Lehmann
via
The New Republic
on
November 23, 2021
Why Do Americans Have So Few Rights?
How we came to rely on the courts, instead of the democratic process, for justice.
by
Samuel Moyn
via
The New Republic
on
March 9, 2021
Making the Supreme Court Safe for Democracy
Beyond packing schemes, we need to diminish the high court’s power.
by
Samuel Moyn
,
Ryan D. Doerfler
via
The New Republic
on
October 13, 2020
Rumor Mill
Watching fake news spread in 1942.
by
Tracy Campbell
via
Lapham’s Quarterly
on
May 20, 2020
The Last Time Democracy Almost Died
By examining the upheaval of the nineteen-thirties, we can recognize similarities between today and democracy's last near-death experience.
by
Jill Lepore
via
The New Yorker
on
January 27, 2020
The Contradictions of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
The Supreme Court justice may have been heralded by many of his progressive peers, but the legacy he left behind is far more ambiguous.
by
Brenda Wineapple
via
The Nation
on
August 13, 2019
No Law Without Politics (No Politics Without Law)
The way to address politicization in the courts is not de-politicization but counter-politicization.
by
Jedediah Britton-Purdy
via
LPE Project
on
October 2, 2018
Previous
Page
1
of 2
Next